• Home
  • Areas of Practice
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact Us

315 West Ponce de Leon Avenue, Suite 1080, Decatur, GA 30030Contact us today to set up a consultation

Georgia Lord Law

Atlanta Collaborative and Family Law Attorney

678-271-0305

  • Home
  • Areas of Practice
    • Family Law
    • Disability Rights
    • Collaborative Practice
  • Resources
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

ADA Requires Accommodation of Peanut Allergy

June 30, 2016 by galord

The U.S. Department of Justice recently found that a theater program for young people violated the Americans with Disabilities Act when it failed to provide adequate arrangements for a 10 year old boy who had a severe allergy to peanuts. The program’s director had agreed to ask other program participants to refrain from bringing nut products to the program’s activities. She refused, however, to commit to having an adult present who could administer an Epi-Pen in the event that the child accidentally ingested some nuts and had trouble breathing. Instead, she told the boy’s mother that the mother would be required to sign a waiver of liability, and should consider attending all sessions that her son attended, so that she could administer the Epi-Pen if needed.

The Justice Department found that the boy has a disability within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The agency reasoned that, “[u]nder the ADA, a disability is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of an individual’s life functions.” The child’s severe nut allergies qualified as a disability under the ADA because it could potentially impair a major life activity, such as breathing.

The Justice Department also found that the program was “a place of public accommodation” within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as Title III of the ADA defines public accommodation to include places of education and service establishments. Some places of public accommodations are exempted from Title III, but the program in question did not qualify for such an exemption, the Justice Department found, because it was not a private club; it was, instead, “open to all children between the ages of seven and eighteen, advertises for members, and exists to make [certain theatrical works] accessible to the entire community.”

Because the program was a place of public accommodation, it had the obligation to make reasonable accommodations for a potential participant’s disability, the Justice Department found. It determined that requiring the program to provide a supervising adult who was able and willing to administer an Epi-Pen would not have been unduly burdensome, given the fact that one would expect a children’s program to include adult supervision for the participating children. The Department also noted that the program had not shown it was unable to find volunteers willing to administer the medication, if needed.

The Justice Department also found that the program had unlawfully retaliated against a participant who had objected to its failure to provide accommodations for the participant with an allergy.

Further information about the situation, and the Justice Department’s determination, can be found HERE.

Filed Under: Child Custody, Disability Rights Law, Uncategorized Tagged With: accommodation, ada, doj, epi-pen, Peanut allergy

« Georgia Lord Gives Divorce Advice to Atlanta Women’s Network
Have Sizeable IRAs? Divorcing? Consider Trusteed IRAs »

Blog Categories

  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Collaborative Law
  • Disability Rights Law
  • Divorce
  • Family Law
  • Financial Planning
  • Firm News
  • Guardian ad litem
  • Same-Sex Couples
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

  • Georgia Lord Chosen to Chair Training on Child Custody Litigation
  • Georgia Lord Teaches Family Lawyers, Chairs Judges Panel Discussion
  • Have Sizeable IRAs? Divorcing? Consider Trusteed IRAs

Recent Tags

accommodation ada ADAPT adultery alimony Americans with disabilities act atlanta women's network Bar of the US Supreme Court child custody children Child support collection collaborative law Contempt Decatur attorneys DeKalb Bar Family Law Section disabilities rights attorney disabilities rights law disabled persons rights divorce doj epi-pen family law Financial Planning Georgia commission on child support Georgia Lord georgia lord attorney Georgia Supreme Court Guardian ad litem income deduction order income withholding IRA Justice Hunstein Lisa Lubar marriage equality MARTA Mobility MARTA paratransit MARTA privatization paratransit Peanut allergy same-sex marriage talking to children about divorce Trusteed IRA us supreme court

Address:

Georgia Lord Law
315 West Ponce de Leon Avenue, Suite 1080
Decatur, GA 30030
Phone: 678-271-0305

Office Hours

Mon-Friday: 9:00AM-5:30PM
After-hour appointments available

Radford Scott, LLP

Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook
  • Georgia Lord Law

Route

Your location: No route could be calculated.

  • Home
  • Areas of Practice
  • Resources
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 Georgia Lord Law • Privacy Policy